Resurrect media-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.

This version works with xpdf, current versions don't.

diff --git a/media-fonts/urw-fonts/Manifest b/media-fonts/urw-fonts/Manifest
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0420237
--- /dev/null
+++ b/media-fonts/urw-fonts/Manifest
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+DIST urw-fonts-2.4-9.fc13.src.rpm 3198315 BLAKE2B 9f4c026af2ee6b472454be43b4e1d11616770cb63841fe022762f18a7c71abc37e442102a3d54b880a6a34117442cf45b2d65133ef9cca564e55a26ac1179824 SHA512 cd8c9eb9e56480e70129c14cc744b944fe51fc616b8b5da46b7251520c84486c6c4354afdd7517569ba7874255c00b755aace076dc2cf1a1d8bdd30e41322d4b
+EBUILD urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild 1888 BLAKE2B 82ee73a1701d792c325b45f93dfec63a05ee1c0d524fafa267917d4830a9c94757a18b54722b7b05437e7cd57ed3783723cf4805d49c610a6aac70ec946fe464 SHA512 da2d97c4d1642c41e011dc452058e5fd43d04a07cae6d4c76d3c46737840387245de67e504772c1da76a03c5599e1fb1a4b11717d49810c4e85d2ad8c7b19eee

diff --git a/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild b/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7ee816d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+
+EAPI=7
+
+# At some point URW++ released fonts under GPL license. After that they were took
+# and improved by Valek Filippov and this work was somehow related with AFPL...
+# At least it can be found on their svn server:
+# http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/trunk/urw-fonts/
+
+# Also, some time ago, sources where published on sf.net:
+# https://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/files/
+# At this point this package was published on a nuber of other sites
+# (gimp.org/cups.org) and media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std was added to the tree.
+# But nobody use that old releases any mover and everybody syncs with
+# svn.ghostscript.com. The most recent tag there is:
+# http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/
+
+# But note that version we have is different from upstream tag. This happened
+# because we started to use redhat versions and followed their versioning. It's
+# hard to say why they use such strange version since they also sync with
+# svn.ghostscript.com. Redhat's ChangeLog states:
+# Tue Jan 8 23:00:00 2008 Than Ngo 2.4-2
+#  - update to 1.0.7pre44
+
+inherit estack rpm font
+
+MY_PV=$(ver_rs 2 -)
+
+DESCRIPTION="free good quality fonts gpl'd by URW++"
+HOMEPAGE="http://www.urwpp.de/"
+SRC_URI="mirror://gentoo/${PN}-${MY_PV}.fc13.src.rpm"
+
+LICENSE="GPL-2"
+SLOT="0"
+KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ~ia64 ~loong ~m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 sparc x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~arm64-macos ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x64-solaris"
+
+RDEPEND="
+       !media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std
+       !media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-other"
+
+S="${WORKDIR}"
+
+DOCS="ChangeLog README*"
+FONT_S="${S}"
+FONT_SUFFIX="afm pfb pfm"
+
+pkg_postinst() {
+       font_pkg_postinst
+
+       elog "If you upgraded from ${PN}-2.1-r2 some fonts will look a bit"
+       elog "different. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
+}