From ff9043a061e58fc09d733996b185fdbc9a2a4b6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:29:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Test more bogus declarations.

---
 tests/cdecl99-c-invalid.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/cdecl99-c-invalid.sh b/tests/cdecl99-c-invalid.sh
index e20af03..7aaba30 100755
--- a/tests/cdecl99-c-invalid.sh
+++ b/tests/cdecl99-c-invalid.sh
@@ -21,22 +21,38 @@ test_decl() {
 }
 
 set -e
+test_decl 'int x$'
+test_decl 'long long long x'
 test_decl 'inline int x'
 test_decl 'restrict int x'
 test_decl 'static auto int x'
 test_decl 'auto x'
+test_decl 'void x'
 test_decl 'int _Complex x'
 test_decl 'typedef int'
+test_decl 'int x, (void)'
+test_decl 'int [5], (void)'
 test_decl 'void f(...)'
 # XXX: While these silly void-parameter declarations are "obviously" invalid, I
 # can't actually find a statement in the specification which forbids them.
 test_decl 'void f(void, void)'
+test_decl 'void f(void, ...)'
 test_decl 'void f(register void)'
 test_decl 'void f(const void)'
+test_decl 'void f(void const)'
 test_decl 'void f(const)'
 test_decl 'void f(typedef int x)'
 test_decl 'void f(static int x)'
 test_decl 'int f(void)[1]'
+test_decl 'inline int (void)'
+test_decl 'int f((x))'
+test_decl 'int f, g((x))'
+test_decl 'int f(void), g(...)'
+test_decl 'int f(inline int g())'
+test_decl 'int f(void)(void)'
+test_decl 'int ((int))'
 test_decl 'int a[0]'
 test_decl 'void a[1]'
 test_decl 'int a[1](void)'
+test_decl 'int a[1nan]'
+test_decl 'int a[99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]'
-- 
2.43.0